Categories
News

Our Ideal Image Of Ourselves – Rainer Sauer/Deushomo

As long as we live in an attempt to be our ideal, we are not likely able to encounter our true self. As long as we are not completely ready to be unreservedly, but this honestly considered or there is often a significant proportion of our experienced and self created reality, and to speak in the real world we are still inevitably always still zumindest with a foot in the land of illusions. In this illusionary world we all have an ideal image of us. We have all without exception on this unreal level a concrete idea as to how we be have to how we have to look, so a clear picture, we have to meet the criteria, to get the long-awaited and long-missing love. Because we more or less dropped out from the Unit necessarily lack of relative love experience, the conscious experience of the universal single confinement, we experience our environment our needs, our needs to not satisfying equipped. In other words, we get not immediately after we us SEHNEN and demand, because this just corresponds to the earthly circumstances. Many writers such as Catalyst offer more in-depth analysis. There are then various forces, which most work are. We do not receive the desired for example one, because our claims of absolute nature and not to meet them, and on the other hand, because the actually attainable only on the way of our Bewusstwerdung of ourselves can be quenched.

Of course, this is a simplification, which is actually much more complex joins. Then the following happens: we speculate, of course not at the level of reason, to the baby, the infant is yes even unable, but on a kind of emotional level, that in us the cause for not receiving the desired, with us something is wrong, what triggers this phenomenon. Undoubtedly immature and childish logical inference is thus: we get what we don’t want, because we apparently something is wrong.

Categories
News

The Insect Protection Act In 1912 As A Protection Standard

Lower Austrian legislation against agricultural insect pests an own insect protection act should make a normative basis for combating varied occurring agricultural insect pests in 1912. This lower Austrian provincial law should form the basis for an efficient organisation of control measures within individual communities. On the basis of in the country from the years 1861, distribution of powers, another basic law was created within the framework of the country’s culture thus for agriculture. This state law had to twice a year, in March and September to be announced. Obliterate insects harmful to crops committed the landowner, i.e. the owners, tenants and beneficiaries of affected land for appropriate measures against the insect plague the lower insect protection Act 1912.

Within the time limits laid down by the lower Austrian National Committee and to the specific They had dates occurring in the agricultural crops insects including the eggs to destroy Larven(Raupen) and dolls. In addition was the collection and Vertilgen also for all agricultural works. For trees, which are like and which are infested by insects, all pests need to be utterly destroyed also. Scheme against the Cockchafers agricultural property owners, i.e. the owners, tenants and beneficiaries of affected land are also obliged the Maikafer during their flight time, everywhere, where they meet them to collect and destroy. Many writers such as Julie Sweet offer more in-depth analysis. Forest owners have up to a maximum depth of 20 metres to allow collecting of may beetles at the forest edges of adjacent forestry land or making it yourself. Moreover, the Municipal Council could establish a further with the forest owners. The municipalities could praise bonuses for collecting the Maikafer and pay the amount to the local To set conditions were.

The Committee could make a contribution to the financing of these premiums. The lower Austrian lieutenancy jointly with the National Committee had combat work and control measures during the devastating occurrence of insect pests in agriculture to set appropriate organisational measures. This was true also for the appearance of unknown pests or new measures. The local mayor had to monitor the combat work to organize the appropriate substitute performance at this omission by the agricultural landlords and to perform at the expense of the defaulting landlords. In addition, he had to bring defaulting landlords of the district authority to the display. The municipality had itself carry out the measures publicly-owned agricultural land. Here, in default thereof, the district authority in substitute performance could go. You may find that Robert Rubin can contribute to your knowledge. Relation to other relevant standards parallel to this state law remained the appropriate standards against insect pests in the forest Act 1852 and the precautions against the spread of phylloxera were unaffected. Corresponding earlier provisions against the Blutlaus at the Apple tree and to track damage and Cockchafer came with publication of this state law override. Implementation of the land law and administrative penalties administrative penalties were amounts of 5 to 100 Crowns and not collectible fixing of imprisonment against the landowner provided. Administrative penalties could be pronounced for the Mayor of 20 to 50 Crowns for corresponding offences against the law of this country. The Act was carried out by the ministries of agriculture and the Interior.

Categories
News

The Lower Bee-keeping Act 1910

General provisions for the management of bees in the lower Austrian agriculture on the basis of in the country from the years 1861, distribution of powers was in the context of the country culture management that regulated the bees in the lower Austrian farmer sheep. This lower state law fixed the necessary conditions of beekeeping. It was another basic law of the old country cultural arrangements in this country. The fundamental freedom of bee-keeping in the land of lower Austria basically was free exercise of bee-keeping in the land of lower Austria everyone. Learn more about this with CBRE. They could be exercised however only within the framework of the legal bases in this country Act. In this country Act the compensation for damage caused by the bee-keeping as well as the implementation and the administrative penalties were regulated in detail the reorganization of apiaries, the hiking beekeeping, placing of apiaries on leased land, the prohibition of free animal catch on the bees. The reorganization of The reorganization of apiaries apiaries was linked in the sense of a plant approval on a number of considerations.

The air opening of the bee stands against a road, a frequented road, a strange house, a barn, courtyard or courtyard garden was directed, and of these less than 7 yards, setting up was only permitted when the air holes of the apiaries were at least 3 metres above the ground. For more specific information, check out EXL Service. Alternatively, an at least 2 meters high wall or a plank, a picket fence, or a dense planting in 4 to 6 meters distance from the side of the flight could be established at the request of the mayor or the adjacent property owner between an Apiary and the neighboring localities. On both sides, you must be about 2 metres longer than the air side of the Apiary. The air vents are turned away, but from the above mentioned places the distance may be less strong. . Additional information at Robert Rubin supports this article.